How Does Solar Energy Reduce Global Warming?

Solar panel shade won’t cool Earth Solar panels fight global warming by producing electricity that keeps us from burning greenhouse gas-producing fossil fuels. They also shade Earth from the sun. This extra shade should fight climate change, too—less solar radiation means a cooler Earth, right? It’s not quite that simple, scientists report online today in Nature Climate Change,

It turns out, The researchers simulated an idealized scenario: an Earth with deserts and urban areas completely covered in solar panels. (Because weather depends on so many factors, the group had to model an extreme scenario to confirm the changes they observed were actually due to solar panels.) The simulation showed that the extra shade first cools the covered area, but that temperature decrease changes local weather patterns.

About 50 years after installing the panels, India and eastern Australia, for example, get warmer because of less rainfall, and the northwestern United States gets warmer because of wind pattern changes. The benefits of solar panels still outweigh their drawbacks, though.

1. Realistic large-scale solar panel coverage could cause less than half a degree of local warming, far less than the several degrees in global temperature rise predicted over the next century if we keep burning fossil fuels.
2. But the study shows that massive solar panel installments shouldn’t be the only fossil fuel alternative, the authors say.

: Solar panel shade won’t cool Earth

Does solar energy contribute to global warming?

The above graph compares global surface temperature changes (red line) and the Sun’s energy received by Earth (yellow line) in watts (units of energy) per square meter since 1880. The lighter/thinner lines show the yearly levels while the heavier/thicker lines show the 11-year average trends.

Eleven-year averages are used to reduce the year-to-year natural noise in the data, making the underlying trends more obvious. The amount of solar energy Earth receives has followed the Sun’s natural 11-year cycle of small ups and downs with no net increase since the 1950s. Over the same period, global temperature has risen markedly.

It is therefore extremely unlikely that the Sun has caused the observed global temperature warming trend over the past half-century. No. The Sun can influence Earth’s climate, but it isn’t responsible for the warming trend we’ve seen over recent decades.

• The Sun is a giver of life; it helps keep the planet warm enough for us to survive.
• We know subtle changes in Earth’s orbit around the Sun are responsible for the comings and goings of the ice ages.
• But the warming we’ve seen in recent decades is too rapid to be linked to changes in Earth’s orbit and too large to be caused by solar activity.

One of the “smoking guns” that tells us the Sun is not causing global warming comes from looking at the amount of solar energy that hits the top of the atmosphere. Since 1978, scientists have been tracking this using sensors on satellites, which tell us that there has been no upward trend in the amount of solar energy reaching our planet.

The Causes of Climate Change Blog Post: What Is the Sun’s Role in Climate Change? Blog Post: There Is No Impending ‘Mini Ice Age’ Climate Change: Incoming Sunlight (NOAA) Earth’s Energy Budget Remained Out of Balance Despite Unusually Low Solar Activity

How does solar energy reduce greenhouse gases?

Rhone Resch – Rhone Resch is President of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), a national trade association representing over 500 solar energy companies in the United States. From Vol. XLIV, No.2, “Green Our World!”, 2007 I n an increasingly carbon-constrained world, solar energy technologies represent one of the least carbon-intensive means of electricity generation.

Solar power produces no emissions during generation itself, and life-cycle assessments clearly demonstrate that it has a smaller carbon footprint from “cradle-to-grave” than fossil fuels. Of the more than 10,000 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity generation produced by the countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), solar currently accounts for just 8 TWh.

Yet solar technologies, including photovoltaics, concentrating solar power and solar thermal constitute the fastest growing energy source in the world. With clear market signals from Governments, these low-carbon technologies could provide more than 30 per cent of the world’s energy supply in aggregate by 2040.

Photovoltaics (PV) are perhaps the most well-known and fastest growing sector of solar technology. PV devices generate electricity directly from sunlight via an electric process that occurs naturally in certain types of material. Groups of PV cells are configured into modules and arrays, which can be used to power any number of electrical loads.

PV energy systems have very good potential as a low-carbon energy supply technology. A September 2006 joint paper by scientists from Brookhaven National Laboratory, Utrecht University and the Energy Research Center of the Netherlands demonstrates that crystalline silicon PV systems have energy payback times of 1.5 to 2 years for South European locations and 2.7 to 3.5 years for middle-European, while thin film technologies have energy payback times in the range of 1 to 1.5 years in South Europe.

Accordingly, life-cycle carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for PV are now in the range of 25 to 32 g/kWh. In comparison, a combined cycle gas-fired power plant emits some 400 g/kWh, while a coal-fired power plant with carbon capture and storage, about 200 g/kWh. Nuclear power emits 25 g/kWh on average in the United States; only wind power is better with a mere 11 g/kWh.

For silicon technology, clear prospects for a reduction of energy input exist, and an energy payback of one year may be possible within a few years as silicon growth processes become more efficient. As a result, this could decrease the life-cycle CO2 emissions to 15 g/kWh.

The global photovoltaic sector has been growing at an average of over 40 per cent in the last eight years, manufacturing over 2,200 megawatts in 2006. PV have become competitive in all market segments, particularly grid-connected applications, as more investment in the sector has produced major advances in automation, manufacturing efficiencies and throughput.

Several leading countries – Germany, Japan and the United States, representing two thirds of the global market – have provided market support programmes to drive down costs. The growth of PV has driven a very classic “experience curve” decline in manufacturing prices.

• Data fairly clearly demonstrate an 18 to 20 per cent “progress ratio” – for every doubling in the cumulative production of solar cells, prices come down about one fifth.
• Currently, solar modules are selling globally from $3 to $5 per watt, while installed systems are generally sold at between $6 and $10 per watt.

Solar energy is the cheapest option for providing power to locations more than half a mile from existing electricity and is generally competitive without subsidies in regions with high energy prices. The PV industry is striving to reduce system costs by 50 per cent by 2015, at which point PV will be cost-competitive with retail electricity costs in most of the United States and other developed countries.

As PV technology becomes increasingly affordable and available, its potential as a major source of low-carbon energy grows. In a 2004 report entitled Solar Generation, Greenpeace and the European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA) estimated that, by 2020, PV could provide 276 TWh of energy – equivalent to 1 per cent of the global demand projected by the International Energy Agency (IEA).

The study assumed that the PV market would grow at a compound annual growth rate of 30 per cent until 2020, well below the 45-per cent growth that the industry averaged from 2002 to 2007. This would replace the output of 75 new coal-fired power stations and prevent the emission of 664 million tons of CO2 annually.

1. Moreover, the report found that with a 15-per cent growth rate from 2020 to 2040, the solar output could be more than 9,000 TWh, which would be 26 per cent of the projected global demand.
2. Concentrating solar power (CSP) plants are utility-scale generators that produce electricity by using mirrors or lenses to efficiently concentrate the sun’s energy.

Two principal CSP technologies are parabolic troughs, which use rows of curved mirrors to drive conventional steam turbines; and the dish-Stirling engine systems, which are shaped much like large satellite dishes and covered with curved mirrors that heat liquid hydrogen to drive the pistons of a Stirling engine.

1. Life-cycle assessment of the emissions produced, together with the land surface impacts of CSP systems, show that they are ideally suited to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and other pollutants, without creating other environmental risks or contamination.
2. According to the European Solar Thermal Industry Association, 1 MWh of installed solar thermal power capacity results in the saving of 600 kilograms of CO2.

The energy payback time of CSP systems is approximately five months, which compares very favourably with their lifespan of 25 to 30 years. During the 1980s and early 1990s, developers built nine concentrating solar power plants in California’s Mojave Desert for a total of 330 MW.

Then, for nearly two decades no new plants were built due to the weakening of the United States federal support for renewables and plummeting energy prices. However, CSP has experienced a renaissance in the last two years. An 11-MW plant in Spain – the first in Europe – became operational in March 2007, while a 64-MW plant in Nevada is in its final stages of construction.

Currently, over 45 CSP projects worldwide are in the planning stages, with a combined capacity of 5,500 MW. With more than 200 GW of resource potential in the American southwest and thousands more throughout the world, CSP offers a rapidly scalable means of low-carbon electricity generation.

A September 2005 report by the European Solar Thermal Industry Federation (ESTIF), Greenpeace and the IEA SolarPACES found that “there are no technical, economic or resource barriers to supplying 5 per cent of the world’s projected electricity needs from solar thermal power by 2040”. The authors calculated that CSP could produce 95.8 TWh/year by 2025, avoiding 57.5 millions tons of CO2 annually for a cumulative 362 million tons in the next 20 years.

By 2040, they found that CSP could produce as much as 16,000 TWh per year. Solar thermal systems provide environmentally friendly heat for household water and space heating. Simple collectors, usually placed on the roof of a house or building, absorb the sun’s energy and transfer the heat.

In many climates, a solar heating system can provide a very high percentage (50 to 75 per cent) of domestic hot water energy. Since, on average, water heating accounts for around 30 per cent of a home’s CO2 emissions, a solar water heater can reduce its total emissions by more than 20 per cent. Many countries are encouraging increased use of solar hot water technology.

Worldwide, installations grew 14 per cent in 2005 to an installed base of 88 GW thermal equivalent, with 46 million houses equipped with the systems. China leads the way, with 62 per cent of the installed capacity, while Israel has the highest per-capita usage, with 90 per cent of all homes taking advantage of the technology.

The IEA Heating and Cooling Program in April 2007 calculated that this global installed solar thermal capacity reduces CO2 emissions by approximately 30 million tons each year. In January, ESTIF proposed an ambitious target of installing 1 square metre of collector area by 2020 for every European – 320 TWh of installed capacity.

Meanwhile, in March, the United States National Renewable Energy Laboratory calculated the current technical potential of solar water heating in the United States at 1 quad of primary energy savings per year, equivalent to an annual CO2 emission reduction of about 50 to 75 million metric tons.

1. Solar energy is an obvious choice for a carbon-smart, reliable energy future.
2. Greater reliance on this comparatively untapped energy resource will help mitigate climate change while stimulating economies, creating jobs and increasing grid integrity and security.
3. However, without robust international and national policy support for solar and other renewable energy sources, society will continue down the path of over-reliance on highly price-volatile, insecure and carbon-intensive energy sources.

Incentives for early adopters, regulatory policies and education initiatives must all be in place to jump-start the mass-market adoption of solar energy. With clear market signals, the industry can build up low-carbon solar energy on a scale large enough to help solve our global energy challenges.

1. Giving Life With the Sun: The Darfur Solar Cookers Project For the 200,000 displaced citizens of Darfur living in refugee camps in Chad, the simple task of cooking a meal poses serious risks.
2. Since wood for cooking is scarce in the desert region, refugees must travel several miles outside the camp to gather firewood, where they are highly vulnerable to attacks by the Janjaweed militia and other predators.

A 2005 report by Médecins Sans Frontières found that 82 per cent of rape attacks occur when women are outside the populated villages, usually while searching for firewood. But in the Iridimi camp with 17,000 refugees in eastern Chad, families have cut their firewood use by 50 to 80 per cent, using simple solar cookers to prepare their meals.

Most solar cookers work on sunlight being converted to heat energy that is retained for cooking. While there are many successful designs, the most adaptable to the needs of refugees is CooKit, from Solar Cookers International, which is made of cardboard or other local material and is cut into a specific shape to effectively reflect the solar light rays toward a black metal pot.

The pot, when painted black on the outside, absorbs and retains solar heat. A clear polypropylene bag tied around it creates an insulating barrier and allows the pot to easily reach 250? Fahrenheit (about 121? Celsius), which is more than enough to cook several litres of food in a few hours.

The KoZon Foundation, a Dutch non-governmental organization that trains women in developing countries to solar-cook, brought the devices to the Iridimi camp for the first time in February 2005, after it obtained funding from the Dutch Foundation for Refugees and a project approval from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

KoZon volunteer, Derk Rijks, and Chadian trainee, Marie-Rose Neloum, provided 100 cookers to several women refugees for a demonstration, which proved to be a success. A second demonstration was organized in April 2005, in which KoZon trained and tested the ability of the refugees themselves to manufacture 120 cookers, emphasizing the creation of a self-sustaining economic activity.

1. A basic workshop, completed in February 2006, provided the necessary tools and space for the manufacture of the cookers.
2. Several refugees were also trained as “auxiliary trainers”, who would teach others how to solar-cook.
3. The Solar Cooker Project accelerated in May 2006, when a coalition of 55 synagogues in southern California in the United States, the Jewish World Watch (JWW), stepped in to fund the large-scale introduction of the cookers throughout the Iridimi camp.

The coalition works to combat genocide and other human rights violations worldwide, and its women’s committee takes on volunteer projects that particularly impact women. “The only way you fight death is by giving life, and the only way that you can overcome genocide is to ameliorate the suffering”, said JWW founder, Rabbi Harold M.

Schulweis. “In this case you have defenseless women without any protection, subject to the sadism of the Janjaweed. To be able to give them the smallest amount of protection and security is of primary significance.” The Project has so far trained 4,500 women and supplied 10,000 cookers to refugees. The Iridimi camp now manufactures approximately 1,000 solar cookers a month as replacements (the cookers typically last for six months), while supplying excess cookers to the 22,000 refugees in the nearby camp in Touloum.

The Project has also reduced the number of foraging trips by approximately 70 per cent, thus lowering the risk of attacks on women and girls. The cookers also provide economic opportunities, not only in their direct manufacture, but also by giving refugees some free time for other activities, rather than cooking and collecting firewood.

1. Many of the women are now engaged in basketry, knitting and other handiwork selling in Europe, by special arrangement with UNHCR and the airlines.
2. The Project has also reaped significant environmental benefits for the people and the region.
3. By reducing firewood consumption, it has slowed down the deforestation process.

The zero-pollution cookers have reduced smoke in the camp, consequently providing health and quality-of-life benefits for refugees. Project partners believe that with the support of the United Nations, the Project could bring solar cookers to the rest of the 200,000 refugees in Chad.

• As important as it is to alert the world, there is nothing that alerts the world more than action”, said Rabbi Schulweis.
• For the United Nations to adopt this would be a reinvigoration.
• It’s illustrative of what can be done even in impoverished countries, even in countries that are divided and scared to death because of internal warfare, that at least we can shield them and give them protection.

It raises the solar industry into something that has a moral character, as well as an entrepreneurial character. In this age, we need not only high technology but also high morality.” -Rhone Resch and Noah Kaye The UN Chronicle  is not an official record. Although major advancements in our understanding of what causes mental health conditions and how to treat them have been made in the last 20 years, very few improvements in service coverage and quality have been made. Light pollution is the theme of this year’s World Migratory Bird Day (8 October 2022), a global campaign to raise awareness about migratory birds and major threats. This year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference—COP 27—will arguably be the most important climate conference of the decade. From 6 to 18 November 2022, world leaders gathering in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt must put words into action to hold the increase in global temperature to 1.5°C.

Do solar panels reduce heat?

According to a study conducted by researchers at UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering, solar panels reduced the amount of heat reaching the roof by an incredible 38%, keeping a building’s roof 5 degrees cooler than portions of a roof exposed to sunlight directly.

How is solar energy eco friendly?

Solar energy and the environment – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Solar energy technologies and power plants do not produce air pollution or greenhouse gases when operating. Using solar energy can have a positive, indirect effect on the environment when solar energy replaces or reduces the use of other energy sources that have larger effects on the environment.

• However, there are environmental issues related to the production and use of solar energy technologies.
• Solar energy tecnologies require use of materials, such as metals and glass, that are energy intensive to make.
• The environmental issues related to the production of these materials could be associated with solar energy systems when conducting life-cycle or so-called cradle-to-grave environmental analysis.

Studies conducted by a number of organizations and researchers have concluded that PV systems can produce the equivalent amount of energy that was used to manufacture the systems within 1 to 4 years. Most PV systems have operating lives of up to 30 years or more.

1. There are hazardous chemicals used to make photovoltaic (PV) cells and panels that must be carefully handled to avoid release to the environment.
2. Some types of PV cell technologies use heavy metals, and these types of cells and PV panels may require special handling when they reach the end of their useful life.

Some solar thermal systems use potentially hazardous fluids to transfer heat, and leaks of these materials could be harmful to the environment.U.S. environmental laws regulate the use and disposal of hazardous materials. The U.S. Department of Energy is supporting various related to solar energy technologies, including the recovery and recycling of the materials used to manufacture PV cells and panels.

Several states have enacted laws that encourage recycling of PV panels. As with any type of power plant, large solar power plants can affect the environment at or near their locations. Clearing land for construction and the placement of the power plant may have long-term effects on the habitats of native plants and animals.

However, installing solar energy systems on land with marginal agricultural value or integrating may provide a variety of economic and environmental benefits to farmers. Some solar power plants may require water for cleaning solar collectors and concentrators or for cooling turbine generators. An array of solar photovoltaic panels supplies electricity for use at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in Twentynine Palms, California Source: U.S. Marine Corps photo by Pfc. Jeremiah Handeland/ (public domain) Last updated: February 25, 2022 : Solar energy and the environment – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

How much does solar energy reduce pollution?

How would transitioning to solar energy impact our planet? – The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) reports that solar technology currently installed across the U.S. will likely counterbalance as much as 16.8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide a year. Source: Getty Images Article continues below advertisement

How much do solar panels save in carbon emissions?

The manufacturing process – The most often cited report comes from Vattenfall’s life cycle studies of electricity in 1999 which shows that solar tends to produce 50g of CO2 per kWh compared to the 975g of CO2 per kWh produced from Coal. Solar panels are therefore at least 20x better kWh for kWh.

1. It is worth noting that this study only looked at 3 countries – Japan, Sweden and Finland which tend to have lower yearly hours of sunlight.
2. The study also does not account for recent advances in panel efficiency over the years so the efficiency of solar is actually probably much higher.
3. The carbon footprint of solar panel production will also vary widely depending on where they are produced and when compared to that location’s main energy source.

For example the carbon footprint of a solar panel produced in China where coal is often used, could be almost twice that of a panel produced in Europe. Despite the energy costs of producing panels, most solar cells pay back the initial energy invested in their manufacturing within 2-3 years.

What do solar panels reduce?

How Does Solar Energy Interact with Wildlife and the Environment? – As a renewable source of power, solar energy has an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change, which is critical to protecting humans, wildlife, and ecosystems.

Solar energy can also improve air quality and reduce water use from energy production. Because ground-mounted photovoltaics (PV) and concentrating solar-thermal power installations require the use of land, sites need to be selected, designed, and managed to minimize impacts to local wildlife, wildlife habitat, and soil and water resources.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) supports research to better understand how solar energy installations, wildlife, and ecosystems interact and to identify strategies that maximize benefits to the local environment.

Do solar panels cool the Earth?

Solar panel shade won’t cool Earth Solar panels fight global warming by producing electricity that keeps us from burning greenhouse gas-producing fossil fuels. They also shade Earth from the sun. This extra shade should fight climate change, too—less solar radiation means a cooler Earth, right? It’s not quite that simple, scientists report online today in Nature Climate Change,

It turns out, The researchers simulated an idealized scenario: an Earth with deserts and urban areas completely covered in solar panels. (Because weather depends on so many factors, the group had to model an extreme scenario to confirm the changes they observed were actually due to solar panels.) The simulation showed that the extra shade first cools the covered area, but that temperature decrease changes local weather patterns.

About 50 years after installing the panels, India and eastern Australia, for example, get warmer because of less rainfall, and the northwestern United States gets warmer because of wind pattern changes. The benefits of solar panels still outweigh their drawbacks, though.

• Realistic large-scale solar panel coverage could cause less than half a degree of local warming, far less than the several degrees in global temperature rise predicted over the next century if we keep burning fossil fuels.
• But the study shows that massive solar panel installments shouldn’t be the only fossil fuel alternative, the authors say.

: Solar panel shade won’t cool Earth

How do solar panels cool your home?

Much of the heat is removed by wind blowing between the panels and the roof. The benefits are greater if there is an open gap where air can circulate between the building and the solar panel, so tilted panels provide more cooling. Also, the more efficient the solar panels, the bigger the cooling effect, said Kleissl.

How efficient is solar energy?

How Efficient Are Solar Panels? – The efficiency of solar panels is determined by the amount of sunlight that is reflected on the panels’ surface, which is then transformed into electrical or thermal energy. Previously, the average efficiency of solar panels was around 15%, but thanks to advancements made in the field of photovoltaic technology, efficiency is now over 20%.

What are the environmental disadvantages of solar energy?

Pollution of soil, air, and water resources – Setting up large-scale solar farms necessitate clearing and grading of vast land areas, leading to compression of soil, excessive soil erosion, and alteration of drainage channels. Cost-cutting and time-saving efforts may result in incorrect disposal of the toxic chemicals used in the manufacturing of solar panels, raising the risk of land, water, and air pollution.

The construction activities in the area at the time of installation of large-scale solar power plants increase the particulate matter in the air, leading to contamination of air and water resources. The release of pathogens present in the soil can increase the risk of air pollution. Solar energy is considered to be free of greenhouse gas emissions.

However, the lifecycle emissions of PV cells during the manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and dismantlement are too significant to ignore.

Do solar panels contribute to heat island effect?

References –

• IPCC. IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2011).
• REN21. Renewables 2014 Global Status Report (Paris: REN21 Secretariat; ISBN 978-3-9815934-2-6, 2014).
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. June 2016 Monthly Energy Review.U.S. Department of Energy. Office of Energy Statistics. Washington, DC (2016).
• Hernandez, R.R. et al. Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 29, 766–779, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041 (2014). Article Google Scholar
• Bazilian, M. et al. Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power. Renewable Energy 53, 329–338, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.029 (2013). Article Google Scholar
• Dale, V.H., Efroymson, R.A. & Kline, K.L. The land use-climate change-energy nexus. Landsc. Ecol.26, 755–773, doi: 10.1007/s10980-011-9606-2 (2011). Article Google Scholar
• Copeland, H.E., Pocewicz, A. & Kiesecker, J.M. In Energy Development and Wildlife Conservation in Western North America (ed Naugle, David E.) 7–22 (Springer, 2011).
• Armstrong, A., Waldron, S., Whitaker, J. & Ostle, N.J. Wind farm and solar park effects on plant-soil carbon cycling: uncertain impacts of changes in ground-level microclimate. Global Change Biology 20, 1699–1706, doi: 10.1111/gcb.12437 (2014). Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hernandez, R.R., Hoffacker, M.K. & Field, C.B. Efficient use of land to meet sustainable energy needs. Nature Climate Change 5, 353–358, doi: 10.1038/nclimate2556 (2015). Article ADS Google Scholar
• Hernandez, R.R., Hoffacker, M.K. & Field, C.B. Land-Use efficiency of big solar. Environmental Science & Technology 48, 1315–1323, doi: 10.1021/es4043726 (2014). Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Pociask, S. & Fuhr, J.P. Jr. Progress Denied: A study on the potential economic impact of permitting challenges facing proposed energy projects (U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 2011).
• Michalek, J.L. et al. Satellite measurements of albedo and radiant temperature from semi-desert grassland along the Arizona/Sonora border. Climatic Change 48, 417–425, doi: 10.1023/a:1010769416826 (2001). Article Google Scholar
• Burg, B.R., Ruch, P., Paredes, S. & Michel, B. Placement and efficiency effects on radiative forcing of solar installations.11th International Conference on Ceonctrator Photovoltaic Systems 1679, doi: 10.1063/1.4931546 (2015).
• Solecki, W.D. et al. Mitigation of the heat island effect in urban New Jersey. Environmental Hazards 6, 39–49, doi: 10.1016/j.hazards.2004.12.002 (2005). Article Google Scholar
• Oke, T.R. The energetic basis of the urban heat island (Symons Memorial Lecture, 20 May 1980). Quarterly Journal, Royal Meteorological Society 108, 1–24 (1982). ADS Google Scholar
• Smith, S.D., Patten, D.T. & Monson, R.K. Effects of artificially imposed shade on a Sonoran Desert ecosystem: microclimate and vegetation. Journal of Arid Environments 13, 65–82 (1987). Google Scholar
• Taha, H. The potential for air-temperature impact from large-scale deployment of solar photovoltaic arrays in urban areas. Solar Energy 91, 358–367, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.09.014 (2013). Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Masson, V., Bonhomme, M., Salagnac, J.-L., Briottet, X. & Lemonsu, A. Solar panels reduce both global warming and Urban Heat Island. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2, 14, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00014 (2014). Article Google Scholar
• Roberts, B.J. Solar production potential across the United States. Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.climatecentral.org/news/eastern-us-solar-development-18714,19 September (2012).
• Monteith, J.L. & Unsworth, M.H. Principles of Environmental Physics Third Edition (Elsevier, San Diego, CA, USA, 1990).
• Campbell, G.S. & Norman, J.M. An Introduction to Eenvironmental Biophysics Second Edition (Springer, New York, USA, 1998).
• Breshears, D.D. The grassland-forest continuum: trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4, 96–104, doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)0042.0.co;2 (2006). Article Google Scholar
• Oke, T.R. Boundary Layer Climates. Second Edition (Routledge: New York,, 1992).
• Ahrens, C.D. Meteorology Today. An Introduction to Weather, Climate, and the Environment Eighth Edition (Thompson, Brooks/Cole: USA, 2006).
• Fthenakis, V. & Yu, Y. Analysis of the potential for a heatisland effect in large solar farms. Analysis of the potential for a heatisland effect in large solar farms; 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 3362–3366 (2013).
• Santamouris, M. Analyzing the heat island magnitude and characteristics in one hundred Asian and Australian cities and regions. Science of The Total Environment 512–513, 582–598, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.060 (2015). Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
• Oke, T.R. City size and the urban heat island. Atmospheric Environment 7, 769–779, doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6 (1973). Article ADS Google Scholar
• Wang, W.-C., Zeng, Z. & Karl, T.R. Urban heat islands in China. Geophysical Research Letters 17, 2377–2380, doi: 10.1029/GL017i013p02377 (1990). Article ADS Google Scholar
• Nasrallah, H.A., Brazel, A.J. & Balling, R.C. Jr Analysis of the Kuwait City urban heat island. International Journal of Climatology 10, 401–405 (1990). Article ADS Google Scholar
• Montávez, J.P., Rodríguez, A. & Jiménez, J.I. A study of the Urban Heat Island of Granada. International Journal of Climatology 20, 899–911, doi: 10.1002/1097-0088(20000630)20:8<899::aid-joc433>3.0.co;2-i (2000).3.0.co;2-i” data-track-action=”article reference” href=”https://doi.org/10.1002%2F1097-0088%2820000630%2920%3A8%3C899%3A%3Aaid-joc433%3E3.0.co%3B2-i” aria-label=”Article reference 30″ data-doi=”10.1002/1097-0088(20000630)20:8 3.0.co;2-i”>Article ADS Google Scholar
• Buyantuyev, A. & Wu, J. Urban heat islands and landscape heterogeneity: Linking spatiotemporal variations in surface temperatures to land-cover and socioeconomic patterns. Landsc. Ecol.25, 17–33, doi: 10.1007/s10980-009-9402-4 (2010). Article Google Scholar
• White, J.G. A Model Ordinance for Energy Projects; Oregon Department of Energy. http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/SITING/docs/ModelEnergyOrdinance.pdf (2005).
• Lovelady, A. Planning and Zoning for Solar in North Carolina. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Government (2014).
• Coutts, A.M., Tapper, N.J., Beringer, J., Loughnan, M. & Demuzere, M. Watering our cities: The capacity for Water Sensitive Urban Design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context. Progress in Physical Geography 37, 2–28, doi: 10.1177/0309133312461032 (2013). Article Google Scholar
• Zar, J.H. Biostatistical analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 215 (1974).

Download references

What are the negative effects of solar farms?

Ecological Impacts – The clearing and use of large areas of land for solar power facilities can adversely affect native vegetation and wildlife in many ways, including loss of habitat; interference with rainfall and drainage; or direct contact causing injury or death. The impacts are exacerbated when the species affected are classified as sensitive, rare, or threatened and endangered.